Context:
-
No Parliamentary proceedings are being held in India during COVID.
-
Many opposition MPs are demanding virtual proceedings.
What is happening in other democracies?
-
Some democracies used conventional ways and continued to meet physically, but with restrictions.
-
Some switched to virtual meetings with the help of technologies that allow remote working.
-
UK has adopted hybrid models. In this, a mix of members is present in the chamber and others participate by video conference.
-
Many states have had to change laws and relax procedures, reset minimum number rules, and rearrange venues.
India’s response:
-
In India, the government shows little or no urgency for parliamentary proceedings.
-
It has shown high resistance to suggestions and interferences by Opposition leaders.
-
For example, former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s suggestions were quickly disregarded by Health Minister Harsh Vardhan earlier.
Suggestions
-
It is very important for governments to listen, learn and correct errors to find the best way forward.
-
The response to a national health crisis needs the participation of all the people’s representatives, across states and party.
-
The virus has brought death and distress to every constituency.
-
To battle this, MPs must group ideas and resources, ask questions and apply the check and balance.
-
The House should reopen its doors virtually to ensure that the executive does not remain limited to echo chambers of its own making.
The conclusion
-
In a shared crisis, one-sided responses are terribly insufficient and even counter-productive. Parliament must return as a space for a wider discussion. The government must take the lead and make this happen.